FLASH: Post-Iowa polls shows dramatic Obama bounce in NH
by Arlen Parsa
No sooner had I written part three in my series part three in my series do I see the latest CNN/WMUR poll. First, let’s summarize the points I made in the aforementioned previous post cautioning against believing early post-caucus polling results in NH:
- Many polls that didn’t show an Obama bounce were conducted partially before the outcome of Iowa was even known
- Many polls that didn’t show an Obama bounce were conducted at a time that Obama’s supporters were least likely to be home and available for telephone interviews (voters under 40 do tend to, you know, do things on Friday nights and Saturdays)
- Historical post-Iowa bounces haven’t materialized instantly after caucus, instead it takes a few days for them to build up
CNN/WMUR had released a Friday-Saturday poll I mentioned in the above post which showed the race essentially tied between Obama and Clinton, with virtually no bounce to be seen. Now they’ve released a new poll taken over Saturday and Sunday which shows dramatically different results. The results are as follows:
| Candidate | Jan 5-6 | Jan 4-5 | Dec 27-30 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Obama | 39% | 33% | 30% |
| Clinton | 29% | 33% | 34% |
| Edwards | 16% | 20% | 17% |
-
Dear Mark Penn,
You wanted it, you got it.
Update: A new Rasmussen poll released Sunday also shows Obama at 39%, with Clinton at 27%.
Update 2: USA Today/Gallup has Obama at 41% versus Clinton at 28%.
Update 3: A new Strategic Vision poll shows Obama at 38%, Clinton at 29%.
Update 4: ARG has Obama 39%, Clinton 28%.
The Daily Background

[…] the most recent polling numbers in NH put Obama clearly […]