CNN plans to release upcoming debate footage under Creative Commons
by Arlen Parsa
Welcome, Slashdot readers! Please consider subscribing to Ye Olde RSS feed (full posts, none of that summary only crap)
CNN announced that it plans to release all debate footage it broadcasts in their upcoming presidential debates under a Creative Commons type license Saturday.
“Due to the historical nature of presidential debates and the significance of these forums to the American public,” CNN said in a statement, “CNN debate coverage will be made available without restrictions at the conclusion of each live debate.”
“We believe this is good for the country and good for the electoral process. This decision will apply to all of CNN’s presidential debates, beginning with the upcoming New Hampshire debates in June,” continued in the media advisory sent to other news organizations and posted online.
Several prominent liberal and conservative bloggers had joined together to endorse a proposal by Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig in April requesting that all television debates during the 2008 Presidential election cycle be released without restriction for internet usage.
Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) was the first candidate to endorse Lessig’s proposal, saying that “As you know, the Internet has enabled an extraordinary range of citizens to participate in the political dialogue around this election.”
“Much of that participation will take the form of citizen generated content. We, as a Party, should do everything that we can to encourage this participation,” Obama continued, later saying he believed that the legal principle of fair use should apply to presidential debates.
Fellow Democratic presidential hopeful and former North Carolina Senator John Edwards joined the call shortly afterwards, saying that the debates should be released specifically under a Creative Commons license and noting that “Much of the content on my own campaign web site is available under just such a license.” Senator Obama’s website is also published under Creative Commons.
So far, no Republican candidates have called for their debates to make their debates freely available, however several prominent conservative bloggers and the former internet director of the Republican National Committee have called on the RNC to pressure the news organizations it has partnered with for the debates to make them available freely.
Among the others calling for the debates to be released under a Creative Commons license are the founders of Craigslist, Wikipedia, BraveNewFilms a former FEC Chair, representatives from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, PBS, the Center for American Progress, MoveOn, the AFL-CIO, and other media organizations.
MSNBC, which broadcast the first Democratic and Republican debates, has refused to release the footage it shot from copyright, preferring to offer only segments of the broadcast on its website in Windows Media format (MSNBC is a dual venture between NBC and Microsoft). MSNBC even went a step further, prohibiting any broadcast of clips on competing television networks after May 26.
But that hasn’t stopped dozens of YouTube users from posting clips of the debate online. No instances of YouTube removing a clip from the debate due to copyright violation have occurred yet. YouTube has tried to attract presidential candidates themselves, and most of the frontrunners have their own accounts.
CNN’s debates, broadcast from New Hampshire, will be in June. Their Democratic debate will be held on June 3rd from 7 to 9PM EST, while their Republican debate will be on June 5th at the same time.
Update: In response to corrections from readers, I have changed this item to more accurately reflect the difference between being entirely uncopyrighted and being released under a Creative Commons license. Thanks for the corrections, everyone!
Update 2: Senator Chris Dodd, another Democratic presidential candidate has now endorsed a Creative Commons release of the debate as well, saying “It is in our interest as a Party to make public our ideas by allowing video of the Presidential debates to be viewed by anyone, at any time. While copyright protections remain essential, I see no cause to maintain copyright on Presidential primary debates.”
The Daily Background

Which CC license? There are many of them, and they vary a lot. Some of they are free, and some are not. It does make a difference!
Creative Commons license are not the same as “uncopyrighted.” I don’t understand what the confusion is with Creative Commons. They simply are licenses under which the copyright holder chooses not to reserve all rights, thereby allowing non-copyright holders to do some things they would not normally be allow to do, such as redistribute or modify the material. In contrast, copyright holders who assert an All Rights Reserved copyright, are reserving all rights, even if they don’t know what rights those are!
[…] to put this up. Ideally, we’d put it up under a permissive Creative Commons license, which is admirably done by CNN for the current presidential debates in the […]
[…] Click Here to Check out the article […]
[…] similar move had been demanded to the whole media world for some time by Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig (founder of […]
psychic medium from medium tara psychic
hello..
thanks
hello..
thanks
As it should be. It would be nice if all public footage of these and all future American presidential election debates were essentially open for redistribution. The original broadcasters are still able to profit from the first broadcast. It is good for the future of our country.
i do admire psychics for their ability to sense some weird stuffs like predict the future or something -,`
The sage speaks of what he sees the fool of what he hears.